Poverty Solutions That Increase Intensives To Create Wealth
Men want mainly two things in life. First money. Second, as many females as possible.
Women want mainly two things in life. First money. Second the best genes, measurable by wealth.
Now you know why males want money.
I support free market. Free market properly aligns humans’ interest to productivity. Free market maximizes productivity as a whole.
However, I am disappointed with the fact that many proponents of free market oppose free sex.
You know what? I’d rather tolerate some socialism in economy to buy votes from losers rather than tolerating opposition to free sex.
Why?
Because restrictions on free sex, currently, will cause more market distortion, inefficiency, and poverty way more than restrictions of free trades.
Men want mainly two things in life. First money. Second, as many females as possible.
However, those men want the two things differently. How much money a man is willing to lose, to get one additional women, for example?
Of course, it’s different.
A rich male is willing to lose millions of dollars for a big harem. A poor male would be happy to go to prostitute once a month if he can get say, $100,000 per year. A homosexual wouldn’t spend a cent for a woman.
Some women insist that they must get Brad Pitt. Some women love to be gang banged by hundreds of males.
Some women are moms. Others prefer to be sluts aiming for quantity like males. Somewhere between, we got whores.
The way we evolve is when we’re not at war, we’re in a race. The reason why so many support deviations from meritocracy is to get rid superior competitors.
Imagine if all women pick Brad Pitt and the rest of us to simply protect them.
Imagine if sexes are really free and ghetto studs just breed and breed and breed expecting the rest of us to pay all the bills?
Obviously most of the other males will simply not agree with it. Rather than defending those leeches from other countries, the other males would join the other countries to bring them down.
However, prohibiting everything else but life long monogamous marriage is like pure communism in sexuality.
We need to properly align our interests to some common goals, like prosperity and security. However, we’ll more efficiently motivate people to that common goal by addressing the want and need of different people.
Nothing does that better than the market and other market like mechanism.
What about paying soldiers hire to encourage protection. What about paying dividend to all citizens and taxing kids.
That way those who value opportunities to make kids more, like billionaires, can just pay but make more kids.
Those who value such opportunities lowly, like the welfare parasites, can postpone making kids, get more money, go to prostitutes, and still vote for free market to increase their dividends.
What about if we tax wealth and kids rather than income so not to discourage people from earning income?
At the end, no people will be so poor they barely live. Poverty will be gone. Still, people will have even more intensive to be rich.
References: 1