Why People Use Violent To Defend Truth?
There is a reason why we don’t have that case around. What would you do to that kind of prosecutors?
What about the other way around. Many defendants want to kill key witnesses. Do you think defendants that do that are innocents?
But that’s what organized religions do. There are many versions of Bible and books. Catholic churches burn them all. The church also slaughtered the gnostic.
There are many version of Quran, and Ali burn most of them.
Can you trust modern religious interpretors? Can you trust conclusions made by destroying evidences and killing those with different beliefs?
To me, why people defend truth with violence is not obvious. Most apologetic explanation raises even more confusion an suspicion.
However, we have the Math of life. We have something like math that can consistently explain life’s phenomena in ways that make sense.
It’s called science. The math of inanimate object is Physics, which you’re all familiar with.
The math of life is evolution theory. That one is heavily censored.
« previous... Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... next »
No Responses to “Why People Use Violent To Defend Truth?”
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.